home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
1095.doc
/
000333_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Fri Oct 6 10:59:36 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-11-07
|
2KB
Received: by mail.webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA243652375; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 10:59:36 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from tom.compulink.co.uk by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA243492343; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 10:59:03 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost) by tom.compulink.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id SAA03890 for lightwave@webcom.com; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 18:51:25 +0100
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 95 18:51 BST-1
From: dbarnard@cix.compulink.co.uk (Dave Barnard)
Subject: Re(2): SMPTE TIME CODE
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Cc: dbarnard@cix.compulink.co.uk
Reply-To: dbarnard@cix.compulink.co.uk
Message-Id: <memo.453895@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9510052202.A11261-0100000@queen>
> Sure SMPTE is usefull in other ways too, but when it comes to LW,
> there is really no use for it.
Well, I for one would find it useful for Lightwave to optionally
count in Hours, Minutes, Seconds and Frames (ie: SMPTE format) rather
than have to calculate how may second into an animation a paricular
frame is, like the PAR
Quick math test: Frame 1132 What's that in H:M:S:F?
See my point?
Of course, Lightwave would have to calculate differently for
NTSC or PAL...
>---- Dave ----<
--
dbarnard@cix.compulink.co.uk (Dave Barnard) sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com